• India launched airstrikes targeting alleged terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir in response to a militant attack.
• Pakistan claims to have downed several Indian drones and jets, which India disputes; claims of a dogfight between 125 fighter jets remains unverified.
• The escalation has led to airspace closures, flight disruptions, civilian casualties, and international calls for de-escalation and diplomatic solutions.

Following a militant attack on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir, India launched airstrikes on what it claimed were terrorist targets in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir. Pakistan has condemned these strikes and vowed retaliation, claiming to have shot down Indian drones and jets. These claims are disputed by India, and the situation has led to heightened tensions, airspace closures, flight disruptions, and international calls for de-escalation. The exchanges of fire across the Line of Control have resulted in casualties on both sides. The international community is urging restraint and a return to dialogue to prevent a wider conflict.

• What: India launched airstrikes on alleged terrorist targets in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, followed by claims of retaliation from Pakistan, including downing drones and fighter jets. India has denied these claims and urged other countries to pressure Pakistan to stop supporting terrorism.
• Who: Key entities involved include the Indian and Pakistani military and governments, militant groups like Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), and international actors like the UN and Turkey.
• When: The escalation began following the April 22nd attack on tourists, with airstrikes occurring on Wednesday and subsequent claims and counterclaims emerging overnight and into Thursday.
• Where: The events primarily occurred in the region of Kashmir, along the Line of Control, and in Pakistani airspace. The airstrikes targeted locations in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, including Muzaffarabad. The impact of the conflict has led to airport closures and flight disruptions in northern and northwestern India.

The situation between India and Pakistan is highly volatile, marked by conflicting claims and a lack of independent verification. Pakistan's claims of downing multiple Indian jets and drones are met with silence or denial from Indian officials. The differing accounts make it difficult to ascertain the true extent of the damage and losses on both sides. The international community is concerned about the potential for further escalation and is urging both sides to exercise restraint. The incident highlights the long-standing tensions in the Kashmir region and the risk of miscalculation leading to a wider conflict. The history of conflict between the two nations adds a layer of complexity to the situation, making diplomatic solutions more challenging.

India has undertaken yet another act of blatant military aggression against Pakistan.

We would recommend you verify your facts and cross-examine your sources before pushing out this kind of disinformation.

If I can do anything to help, I will be there.

The recent exchange of airstrikes and claims of downed drones has dangerously amplified the volatile situation in Kashmir, underscoring the persistent lack of trust and escalating military posturing between India and Pakistan. The Pahalgam attack, which resulted in the death of 25 people, acted as a catalyst for the current escalation, with India launching "Operation Sindoor" targeting sites within Pakistan. Pakistan has responded with retaliatory measures, including claims of shooting down Indian jets and drones. These actions have led to casualties on both sides, including civilians, and have prompted widespread concern from international actors. The closure of airports and the suspension of trade further exacerbate the situation, impacting regional stability. Resolving this crisis demands more than just calls for de-escalation; it requires a commitment to transparency through independent investigations into the attacks, restraint from further military actions, and, most critically, a willingness from both nations to engage in meaningful dialogue that includes Kashmiri voices to address the underlying issues. Without a shift towards comprehensive diplomatic solutions and a focus on the self-determination of the Kashmiri people, the region remains on the brink of a potentially catastrophic conflict, with far-reaching implications for international peace and security.